Next: The time dependent Schroedinger
Up: Overview and Background
Previous: Previous related work
  Contents
Ingrid Daubechies defined the class of compactly supported
wavelets [15]. Briefly, let
be a solution
of the scaling relation
The
are a collection of coefficients that categorize the specific wavelet
basis. The expression
is called the scaling function.
The normalization
of the scaling function implies the condition
The translates of
are required to be orthonormal
From the scaling relation this implies the condition
For coefficients verifying the above two conditions, the functions
consisting of translates and dilations of the scaling function,
, form a complete, orthogonal basis for square integrable
functions on the real line,
.
If only a finite number of the
are nonzero then
will have compact support.
Smooth scaling functions arise as a consequence of the degree
of approximation of the translates. The conditions that the polynomials
be expressed as linear combinations of the translates
of
is implied by the condition
for
The compactly supported wavelet is defined by the equation
The translates of the scaling function and wavelet define orthogonal
subspaces. i.e.
The orthogonal subspaces:
are related by the condition
This is the basis of Mallat, or Wavelet, transform
where
.
In Figure 1 we see pictured an example of a compactly supported
scaling function and its associated fundamental wavelet function.
Figure 1: Daubechies' Scaling and
Wavelet Functions for
with support on
 |
By rescaling and translations we obtain a complete
orthonormal system for
which has sufficient smoothness to also
be a basis for
. This wavelet system then yields a
basis for solution
methods for second order elliptic boundary problems on intervals on the real
line. The illustrated example, which is due to Daubechies
[15], has fundamental support
.
Next: The time dependent Schroedinger
Up: Overview and Background
Previous: Previous related work
  Contents
John Edward Weiss
2002-09-30